HUMAN RIGHTS (UNITED NATIONS)
According to the United Nations, human rights are “inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status.” These rights include life, liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of expression, and access to work and education—without discrimination.
Yet in the United States, despite the additional safeguards of the Bill of Rights and other constitutional protections, these fundamental human rights continue to be violated. Qualified immunity routinely blocks victims from obtaining even a shred of accountability in cases of police and court corruption and brutality. For example, in Jessop v. City of Fresno (2019), officers who allegedly stole $225,000 during a search received qualified immunity because the right “not to have police steal your property” wasn’t “clearly established.” This doctrine shields judges, prosecutors, legislators, and others from consequences, allowing systemic abuse to persist unchecked. Similarly, prosecutorial immunity protected the district attorneys in the Duke Lacrosse case who pursued false charges despite exculpatory evidence, while judicial immunity shielded judges in the Kids for Cash scandal in Pennsylvania, where juveniles were sentenced to for-profit detention centers in exchange for kickbacks.
Whether through qualified immunity, prosecutorial immunity, or absolute immunity, these legal protections are primarily utilized to violate fundamental human rights.
As a result, immunity makes it essentially impossible for victims of government misconduct and brutality to secure meaningful redress.
UPDATE (2025): The U.S. has withdrawn from the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and paused funding to UNRWA, while still claiming commitment to the **Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Given its track record of ongoing human rights violations, brutality within its courts and prisons, and systemic abuses in politics, that claim rings hollow.
IMMUNITY PROTECTS CORRUPTION
”Immunity must be abolished because it allows law enforcement – as well as other government officials – to repeatedly violate the constitutional rights of people without consequence.“
Police use immunity to get away with violence
It’s not the technology, it’s the immunity
Police control access to footage, mostly refusing to release videos—especially in cases of clear misconduct or lethal force. Departments routinely withhold evidence from outside investigators and courts, manipulating narratives and obstructing accountability. Body cameras, once hailed as a solution for transparency, have instead become tools of selective disclosure, reinforcing systemic protections for law enforcement rather than exposing their abuses.
JUDICIAL IMMUNITY shouldn’t be ABSOLUTE…
Judicial immunity was never meant to be absolute—yet here we are, with corruption thriving under its protection.
An interconnected web of agencies ensures that justice remains nearly impossible to pursue, while judicial misconduct escalates, unchecked and emboldened.
Among the greatest barriers to accountability is the shield of absolute immunity, reinforced by secrecy and the lack of transparency—especially in family law courts. Judges and officials, still human—fallible and corruptible—operate in an environment ripe for misconduct, where power protects itself.
It’s been said that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The judiciary, government, and their collaborating agencies have built safe havens where criminal intent flourishes without consequence—shielded by judicial discretion and doctrines of ‘qualified’ immunity. These protections sustain a network of tyrannical actors operating under color of law (see Title 18 U.S.C. Section 242), rather than justice or respecting sovereign humanity.
My hope is that we, along with our children, will be the generation that finally dismantles the barriers dividing us and ushers in an era of genuine truth, safety, and accountability.
Among the greatest barriers to accountability is the shield of absolute immunity, reinforced by secrecy and the absence of transparency—especially in courts presiding over family law. Judges and officials, still human, thus fallible and corruptible, operate in an environment ripe for misconduct, where ‘power’ protects itself.
It’s been said: power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The judiciary, the government, and their collaborating agencies have built safe havens where criminal intent flourishes without consequence—shielded by judicial discretion and doctrines of qualified immunity. These protections sustain a network of tyrannical actors operating under color of law (see Title 18 U.S.C. Section 242), rather than enforcing justice or respecting sovereign humanity.