FIGHTING
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION

FIGHTING JUDICIAL CORRUPTIONFIGHTING JUDICIAL CORRUPTIONFIGHTING JUDICIAL CORRUPTION
  • HOME
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • EXERCISE YOUR FIRST
  • LIBERTY
  • LINKS & FORMS
  • APPELLATE-SUPREME COURT
  • COURT WATCH
  • CASE LAW
  • UCCJEA
  • IMMUNITY INJUSTICE
  • MISCONDUCT AND COMPLAINTS
  • FOIA
  • CAMERAS, AN EQUALIZER
  • CONTENT & INTERVIEWS
  • CONTACT
  • DONATE
  • 13P CRIMINAL COPS
  • More
    • HOME
    • SUBSCRIBE
    • HUMAN RIGHTS
    • EXERCISE YOUR FIRST
    • LIBERTY
    • LINKS & FORMS
    • APPELLATE-SUPREME COURT
    • COURT WATCH
    • CASE LAW
    • UCCJEA
    • IMMUNITY INJUSTICE
    • MISCONDUCT AND COMPLAINTS
    • FOIA
    • CAMERAS, AN EQUALIZER
    • CONTENT & INTERVIEWS
    • CONTACT
    • DONATE
    • 13P CRIMINAL COPS

FIGHTING
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION

FIGHTING JUDICIAL CORRUPTIONFIGHTING JUDICIAL CORRUPTIONFIGHTING JUDICIAL CORRUPTION
  • HOME
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • EXERCISE YOUR FIRST
  • LIBERTY
  • LINKS & FORMS
  • APPELLATE-SUPREME COURT
  • COURT WATCH
  • CASE LAW
  • UCCJEA
  • IMMUNITY INJUSTICE
  • MISCONDUCT AND COMPLAINTS
  • FOIA
  • CAMERAS, AN EQUALIZER
  • CONTENT & INTERVIEWS
  • CONTACT
  • DONATE
  • 13P CRIMINAL COPS

USEFUL LINKS, FORMS, CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE


LINKS & FORMS

GET SOMEWHERE SAFE IF YOU ARE FILING AGAINST A CORRUPT COURT
SERVICES & FORMS [U.S. COURTS]US Law, Case Law, Codes, Statutes & RegulationsCIVIL FORMSFederal Rules of Civil ProcedureWRIT OF CERTIORARIPETITION FOR A WRIT OF HAEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241PROSPECTIVE INDIGENT PETITIONERS GUIDE FOR WRITS OF CERTIORARI TEXAS STATUTES [TX STATE LAW LIBRARY]TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE [TRCP]TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE [TRAP]TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE [WRIT OF MANDAMUS]TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE [WRIT POWER]

PRO SE

FIND A REPUTABLE GROUP TO NAVIGATE THIS WITH, IF YOU CAN
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS-PRO SE 15 (NON-PRISONER)PRO SE (WIKIPEDIA REFERENCE OVERVIEW WITH USEFUL LINKS)U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMSWinkelman v. Parma City School Dist., 550 U.S. 516 (2007)A GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTATION (FEDERAL)Rankin v. HowardSHEPARDIZING

To be truly empowered, always do your own fact-checking


INTERFERENCE WITH CUSTODy

STAY UP TO DATE—CHECK YOUR STATE FOR LEGAL CHANGES
1. ALABAMA2. ALASKA3. ARIZONA4. ARKANSAS5. CALIFORNIA6. COLORADO7. CONNECTICUT8. DELAWARE9. FLORIDA10. GEORGIA11. HAWAII12. IDAHO13. ILLINOIS14. INDIANA15. IOWA16. KANSAS 17. KENTUCKY18. LOUISIANA


19. MAINE20. MARYLAND21. MASSACHUSETTS 22. MICHIGAN23. MINNESOTA24. MISSISSIPPI25. MISSOURI26. MONTANA 27. NEBRASKA 28. NEVADA 29. NEW HAMPSHIRE30. NEW JERSEY31. NEW MEXICO32. NEW YORK33. North Carolina34. NORTH DAKOTA35. OHIO36. OKLAHOMA 37. OREGON38. PENENSYLVANIA39. RHODE ISLAND40. SOUTH CAROLINA41. SOUTH DAKOTA


42. TENNESSEE43. TEXAS44. UTAH45. VERMONT46. VIRGINIA47. WASHINGTON48. WEST VIRGINIA49. WISCONSIN50. WYOMING

Copyright © 2022 fightingjudicialcorruption.com 

All Rights Reserved.


Powered by

This website uses cookies.

The website host uses cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. Therefore, by accepting their use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data, when using this website. 

DeclineAccept